City of Leicester - Leicester City Guides in UK - http://www.city-of-leicester.info
Why Laker should not sign Lebron James?
http://www.city-of-leicester.info/articles/70013/1/Why-Laker-should-not-sign-Lebron-James/Page1.html
King Fisher
ClickOnIt provides you the opportunity to build your own website store of the finest products or you can ask for our expert team to develop a custom build website for you according to your business requirements. Don't amend your business process, get the right website software which fit in your business. We have a team of experts with more than 10 years of  experience in SEO which can help you to bring sales.
 
By King Fisher
Published on 03/1/2010
 
This scenenario would unfortunately be bad for the NBA. Bad for Nike, and really really bad for ESPN. Nike would have to scrap there overly competitive muppet rivalry. It would make it that much more difficult for ESPN to discredit Kobe's achivements and praise Lebron's performances .(Even though I'm certain they wiould still find a way)

Lebron James To L.A:Good For The Lakers Great For Lebron Bad For NBA
With the media handing over every thing to Lebron except a ring and a day as the Commander in Chief, Lebron would probally get the credit for the Lakers winning the title. Even though he couldn't win one on his own coming out of the weaker Eastern Conference.

This scenenario would unfortunately be bad for the NBA. Bad for Nike, and really really bad for ESPN. Nike would have to scrap there overly competitive muppet rivalry. It would make it that much more difficult for ESPN to discredit Kobe's achivements and praise Lebron's performances .(Even though I'm certain they wiould still find a way)

Last night I was aimlessly browsing the web when I came across a handful of notable websites spreading the rumour that "Lebron James would be joing the Lakers next year. After laughing myself to an uncontrollable frenzy for the next 5 mins, I sat back and did the unthinkable, I considered it.

This is what I came up after about with, the move would be good for the Lakers, not great. My reasoning behind that is the Lakers have proven they can win a championship without Lebron. So in retrospect Lebrons would need LA, not vice versa.

They most certain would be able to win a ring with him also, but you also take a chance of a major malfunction occuring with two alpha males going at each others neck for the lead role.

The Lakers would go on to win atleast the next 4 titles they have the chance to do that now, but with Lebron and Kobe it would be a much easier road to sucess if it worked.

On the other hand this would be great for Lebron! With his star power, he would not only pile up the rings, but he will land more endorsements, hell maybe even spark up a acting career in Tinsel Town.

Last but not least it would totally eliminate the competiton around the league. Imagine if Magic and Larry Bird was on the same squad, what would of became of the NBA during the 80's. What if Isiah Thomas would of gotten traded to the Bulls? What if Dwight Howard got traded to the Phoenix Suns? It would take away from the  sportsmanship and integrity of the game. and the way I see it hasn't Tim Donaghy done enough of that already.